
Imelda Marcos (b. 1929), "one of the ten richest women in the world" (Cosmopolitan magazine, December, 1975)
In December, 1975, Cosmopolitan magazine named Imelda Marcos, the First Lady of the Phillippines, as one of the ten richest women in the world. It even went a step further and speculated that Imelda was perhaps the richest woman in the world, richer than Queen Elizabeth II of Great Britain.
Everyone knew Imelda was rich; she made sure of that. She had an insatiable desire for expensive things and flaunted them. No one at the time really knew where she got all the money that she spent so impulsively. She was, after all, unemployed and had no independent wealth. In addition, her husband, the dictator, Ferdinand Marcos, had made less than $5,000 a year for the last ten years in office.
Nonetheless, there was Imelda, spending $40,000 on a Honolulu shopping spree in 1974, without trying anything on. Her excess knew no limits and she spared herself no luxury:
“Another report had Imelda and a gaggle of friends demanding Bloomingdale’s in New York be closed for a private shopping extravaganza, then marching through the store pointing to desired items and saying, ‘Mine. Mine. Mine. Mine.’”(1) She was referred to by one sales clerk as ‘the Mine Girl.’
Responding to criticism of her self-indulgence and the spending of public money for high-profile projects that did nothing to alleviate the poverty of the Filipinos, Imelda remarked that is was her “duty” to be “some kind of light, a star to give [the poor] guidelines.”
By 1981, Imelda’s personal popularity was at an all-time high. She jetsetted around the globe, shopping and hobnobbing with celebrities such as the perennially-tanned American actor George Hamilton.
After having secured the Miss Universe Pageant for the Philippines in 1974 - which necessitated the rapid construction of the 10,000-seat Folks Art Center – Imelda continued to indulge her ”edifice complex,” building 14 luxury hotels, a multimillion-dollar Nutrition Center, Convention Center, Heart Center and, in 1981, the infamous Manila Film Center.
Imelda wanted Manila to rival Cannes as a world film capital. At the cost of $25 million, Imelda approved plans for the Manila Film Center to be built to host an international film festival. Opening night was set for November 18, 1981. The project was grandiose and expensive; the building on Manila Bay was designed to look like the Parthenon.
Delays hampered the progress. As the deadline drew nearer, it required 4,000 workers, working in 3 shifts, around the clock, if the building was going to be ready.
Then, the day before opening night, at 3 a.m. on November 17, the upper scaffold collapsed and sent workers falling into wet cement. A witness said that some of the workers were impaled on upright steel bars.
Imelda was contacted about the accident. She was told that the recovery of the bodies would take alot of time – time, evidently, that Imelda didn’t want to give up. She ordered the construction to continue as planned and that the bodies – maybe as many as 169 – be covered with cement. It is believed that many of those who fell into the cement may have been buried alive.
The full story has never been told, as news crews, rescuers, and ambulance teams were barred from the scene for nine full hours, while the government, under martial law, prepared its official version of events, censoring all news and silencing all witnesses.
Despite all, the festival opened on schedule on Nov. 18, 1981, and had among its guests Brooke Shields, Franco Nero, Ben Kingsley, and Robert Duvall. The first film shown in the theater was the tasteful bioepic, “Gandhi.” Unknowingly, the stars partied atop a mausoleum of dead workers.

Brooke Shields (b. 1965) was only 16 years old when she traveled to Manila for the international film festival as the guest of First Lady Imelda Marcos.
“During opening night, Imelda ‘strode on stage in a Joe Salazar black and emerald green terno with a hemline thick with layer upon layer of peacock feathers.’ “Some said there were diamonds embedded in the skirt.
The next year, as a result of the accident scandal, the government withheld $5 million in festival funding. Imelda was in a fix. She had to pay for the festival somehow, so she ran pornography films in the festival’s second and, understandably, last year.
(1) Klaffke, Pamela. Spree: A Cultural History of Shopping.
Readers: For more on Imelda and Ferdinand Marcos on this blog, click here.

A close-up of Imelda Marcos looking into a gold-plated compact mirror, her first name encrusted in diamonds. Called the 'Steel Butterfly,' Imelda Marcos was the beautiful wife and confidante of Philippine dictator Ferdinand Marcos. The Marcos regime (1965-86) was marked by notorious corruption, political repression, and financial improprieties of the highest order.
For other resources, click here.

















From a daily reader who is grateful for your writing.
You are so kind. Your sweetness put wind in my sails. Thank you.
Dear Lisa,
With this post, you have revealed the true depths of narcissism that was Imelda Marcos. The popularly-recognized excesses, e.g., that she had more shoes than we have grains of sand on our planet, begin to look almost innocent by comparison- like the fatuous desires of an idiot child. With this last post, which describes how Marcos reduced the sanctity of human lives and suffering to so much rubbish, you have completed the puzzle. Imelda Marcos was not a fatuous child; Imelda Marcos was a narcissistic psychopath.
Your elucidation of such critical historical profiles is invaluable to us all.
Lisa, where have you been all our lives?
Very Sincerely,
Shirley Kavanaugh
Shirley, you gush! Let’s not forget that Imelda is alive and running for office again in the Philippines. Fatuous is a good description of her. Thanks for stopping by Lisa’s History Room. Don’t be such a stranger, you hear?
Dear Lisa,
Truthfully, I have been hanging around your History Room, anxiously hoping to be the millionth reader, but ultimately I was outfoxed by another glory hound.
I did not know that IM is running for office again in the Philippines! In that case, I will certainly refrain from referring to her in the past tense (but cannot promise that my heart does not wish it true).
Sincerely,
Shirley K.
Well said.
Ugh! I can’t stand this woman and what I’ve read about her. I read about the Beatles debacle and oh man do I feel embarrassed and ashamed at the actions the people of my parents’ home country.. It’s no wonder that often their shows have our people sing popular Western music (and to be blunt, I hear it *everyday* on my grandma’s TV and it’s not very good). My sister just told me she heard a terrible rendition of Erasure’s “Always” recently.
Dictators and celebs wanting to be politicians. Good job Philippines. Way to go *golf clap*
Yeah, I don’t have a lot of pride in my country.
I do have some pride but only where it counts (and I’d rather keep that to myself).
Hey, Jaybean, I appreciate the comments. Glad you liked the post. Keep coming back.
Thanks for this interesting blog. I was not aware that IM was THAT bad. Yes, Shirley was right. She is a psychopath! Your blog has made me more hungry to learn about the Marcos era. I can’t believe I am this ignorant. Now I’m ashamed of myself for voting their son. Btw, she did win by a large margin in this election. Ugh!
The Internet is such a great gift for people seeking knowledge. It has helped me immensely. Jess, keep coming back!
I am not really totally agreeing with some of the against- imelda’s- comment though i will try to understand your feelings. I must say yes you may be ignorant not knowing so much about ones character but whenever you read articles it should not change your feeling right away. But that being said, it shows that you are not open to more ways of knowing others better. The kids of MARCOS is not the same as them. Are you exactly the same thingking and decision maker such as your mom or dad? ofcourse not. that should not be an issue as reflection that people might perceive that you are totally the same as your parents. Fairness in every point of view do counts. And i just wish people think really what people writes about how they feel. We keep making mistakes in life and there are rooms that we can do things right. The marcos’s has every right to defend themselves and they do to this day-why people dont understad after many trials or atleast give the thought of-just maybe they are really telling the truth. THAT IS ALL I WANT TO SHARE. Philippines was a lot more better then-than now. No blaming, no hate just move on. They did know how to make the nation better then than any politicians could ever visioned and implented and do the right job than the MARCOS’S.
rg.
Definitely this is something that i must not be proud of but you may also have to include the good deeds Imelda has done in the Philippines.
It is a grievous error to think this way, Dan.
i agree with DAN.
rg.
Hi there,
Reading your article is somewhat one sided. Let me share that IM was not guilty with 350,000 files/documents laid against her and Marcos Sr. It is griveous for me to know that you only write the bad sides based on your judgement and people’s idea or some press writings . Don’t we all somehow have IMELDA in us? Did you forget that she after all implemented all the projects she had laid on the table then than most of any politicians ever did? You may also forgotten that without IMELDA’S diplomatic ways there would be no end of the cold war- in reference to her visit to CHARIMAN MAO of China. “it only takes 5 minutes to end of a cold war-through respect” imelda marcos. That i may say was and is to this day one of the greatest achievement she contributed, not only for her nation but to the world. She loves ARTS, MUSIC and Fashion. That is inspirational?
Somehow we need to write the good things because others may be feeded to only the mere facts-bad sides of one’s characters. Sadly enough to say you wrote only the other side which maybe not true at all and creates hate and injustice treatment toward IM for many. Be fair.
Thank you.
rg.
RG, I can see that there is no use trying to talk sense to you. If you want to love and idolize a person who murders her political enemies and takes food out of the bread of babies to build museums, I can’t stop you. I’m sure Hitler had his good points, too, were I to be foolish enough to take this line of reasoning. This is a history site. You will find no hagiography here. Perhaps you should not visit Lisa’s History Room again if you are unprepared emotionally to read the truth.
Accusing someone a murderer and pointing out “Hitler” and “babies ” were not the words i was expecting from you. Thank you. You have said enough about how you really feel.
Rg.
[...] Imelda Marcos: The “Mine” Girl « Lisa's History Room [...]
Note … Imelda wasn’t seen with George Harrison, but George Hamilton.
OOPS! That’s why I need readers. Thanks, Doc.
Imelda Marcos had her charms and she was visually impressive, but the harm she did the Philippines far outweighed the good. I grew up there. I know what it was like. My parents were acquainted with politicians of the time and were friends with a few of Mrs. Marcos’ blue ladies (confidants). Quite a few times the presidential palace extended both social and political invitations to my parents, which my parents all declined because they knew firsthand the corruption, the thievery, and the delusion of grandeur that so plagued Mrs. Marcos.
Whatever projects Mrs. Marcos spearheaded in the name of prosperity, she truly did so in the name of her ego. That is why a nation revolted against her and her husband, and why, when the couple were sent into exile, the presidential palace was opened to the public as a museum of greed. Among the items in the palace were throw cushions embroidered with such lines as “Nouveau riche is better than no rich at all,” a mirror and hair brush encrusted with diamonds, and a collection of ermine mink (for the tropics?).
Where have you been, RG? Are you really so ignorant?
- finalwordful
Rvsy, we needed to hear from you. Thanks for sharing.